Skip to main content

Friday, 22 November 2024 | 09:51 am

|   Subscribe   |   donation   Support Us    |   donation

Log in
Register


In a heart-wrenching incident, Priyadarshini Patil succumbs to despair, ending her life amidst a prolonged and agonizing custody battle with Australian govt, a chilling testament to a mother's fight for her children, now echoing in the silence left behind

A venomous claim of improper care engulfed the family home, catapulting them into a nightmare that seemed to have no end
 |  Satyaagrah  |  News
A Heart-Wrenching Chain of Events: The Struggles and Demise of NRI Priyadarshini Patil in a Foreign Land - Representational image
A Heart-Wrenching Chain of Events: The Struggles and Demise of NRI Priyadarshini Patil in a Foreign Land - Representational image

In a world that continues to tear at the very essence of familial bonds, we are yet again confronted with a heart-wrenching story that brings to light the seemingly never-ending cycle of agony experienced by Indian parents battling against foreign child welfare systems. As a heavy cloud of despair overshadows the Patil family, we delve deep into this horrifying narrative of pain and suffering, which sadly is not an isolated incident.

With the unfathomable grief that surrounds the recent passing of Priyadarshini Patil, a 40-year-old Non-Resident Indian (NRI) woman, we are reminded that the hurt is far from over. Last week, amidst a relentless custody battle in Australia, Priyadarshini succumbed to the overwhelming burden, ending her own life in Karnataka. This harrowing event echoes the ongoing torment witnessed in the Ariha Shah case in Germany, where two distraught parents are engaged in a relentless fight to reclaim their toddler from the clutches of foster care.

Yet, as we reel from this tragedy, it becomes painfully apparent that this is but a link in a chain of harrowing events stretching across borders, engulfing Indian and Indian-origin parents in their vortex. A chain that had its beginnings with the distressing case of Sagarika Chakraborty and Norway, only to find a heartrending echo in the case of baby Ariha in Germany. Now, this chain of agony has found a new link with the torment endured by Priyadarshini and the daunting Australian child welfare system. Each chapter in this chain narrates a tale of broken families, shattered dreams, and an unspeakable loss that weighs heavy on the Indian diaspora.

In the eye of this tempest is Priyadarshini Patil, whose life was cruelly truncated, leaving an indelible mark of sorrow. It seemed the fates conspired against her when news reached her that the online hearing, a glimmer of hope in the fierce battle for her children, was deferred to November. The agony of waiting, the uncertainty swirling around the future of her precious offspring — son Amartya, aged 17, and daughter Aparajita, aged 13 — proved too much to bear.

Before embarking on this road paved with hurt and frustration, Priyadarshini was a vibrant IT employee, united in matrimony with Lingaraja Patil, a fellow techie residing in Sydney. The couple, who were blessed with two children, faced the unimaginable when their children were forcibly removed from their loving embrace in 2021. The genesis of their heartache stemmed from a distressing hospital admission of their son, Amartya, who was grappling with ulcerative colitis, a debilitating condition that wreaks havoc on the digestive tract. Media reports paint a grim picture, one of a family torn apart by circumstances beyond their control, caught in the tangled web of a system that seemed indifferent to their anguish.

As we navigate this tragic journey, we pledge to unravel the many layers of hurt and delve deep into the struggles faced by Indian and Indian-origin parents, caught in the crossfires of child welfare services in foreign lands. Through their stories, we seek to shed light on the pervasive hurt that permeates the lives of families like the Patils, caught in a relentless cycle of agony, anger, and frustration.

Six months into a medical ordeal that saw no light, the Patils desperately reached out, begging for a medical transfer for their ailing son, Amartya. Their pleas met with a rigid and indifferent wall, heralding the onset of a vicious child protection case that seemed to defy logic and compassion. The bitter irony lay in the accusations leveled against Priyadarshini by the very hands that should have held the balm of healing. A venomous claim of improper care engulfed the family home, catapulting them into a nightmare that seemed to have no end.

Australia’s child welfare services, taking a cue from the hospital’s harsh allegations, embarked on a series of investigations that initially appeared to vindicate the beleaguered family. However, the pendulum swung with devastating force as a seventh report emerged, brutally severing the fragile threads that bound the Patil family together.

In the deafening silence that followed, a broken Priyadarshini beseeched the Australian government, a desperate mother's plea to revoke her children's citizenship, a cry to return to the nurturing bosom of her homeland. The hushed corridors of bureaucracy returned no answer, leaving her standing at the precipice of despair, the chilling wind of abandonment cutting through her very soul.

The clock ticked mercilessly as Priyadarshini grappled with the agonizing decision to leave the shores that had turned hostile, a return to the comforting embrace of her parents in Dharwad looming as a beacon of solace. Yet, destiny had scripted a darker path, guiding her to the silent waters of the Naviluthirtha reservoir in Savadatti, where, in an act of utter desperation and heart-wrenching sacrifice, she ended her life.

And in that final act of despair, Priyadarshini bared her soul, leaving behind a testament of anguish that reverberates with an intensity that shatters the heart. A chilling letter unearthed in her belongings, a raw and piercing scream encapsulated in ink, recounting the relentless harassment and the systematic destruction of a family that once held dreams in their palms.

“From 2021 to the present day DCJ (Australia’s Department of Communities and Justice) has ruined my family. The residents of Verlie Street in Sydney have harassed us,” Priyadarshini's words resonate with a chilling echo, leaving an indelible mark on our souls as we stand witness to a tragedy that should never have unfolded, a scathing indictment of a society that failed to protect its most vulnerable.

As we navigate this tragic narrative, we find ourselves engulfed in a tempest of anger and frustration, a furious demand for justice for a woman who loved too deeply, fought too bravely, and suffered too greatly. It is a clarion call for humanity to rise, to ensure that Priyadarshini's voice, laden with hurt and grief, becomes the rallying cry for change, a beacon that guides us to a world where compassion holds sway, where justice does not remain an elusive dream.

In the wake of a tragedy that shook the foundations of human empathy, the narrative deepens and festers, revealing a sinister undercurrent of harassment and perceived threats that seemingly infiltrated Priyadarshini's life, permeating her very existence.

In the throes of her anguish, Patil had penned down a litany of names, attributing them to her impending death - an alarming claim that paints a picture of systemic torment and vilification. The allegations contained within her farewell note hint at an even darker narrative, involving poisoned water supplies and relentless harassment from individuals in her community. As the list unfolds, echoing names of families and even a police officer, it is evident that Priyadarshini felt herself surrounded, trapped in a veritable web of mounting threats and hostilities.

Following this appalling revelation, SS Desai, the grieving father who lost a child to an unyielding system, stepped into the fray with an unyielding resolve. Resolute in his determination to uncover the truth behind his daughter's heartbreaking departure, he approaches the Dharwad police, seeking justice for Priyadarshini and pledging to combat the injustices that plagued her through the echelons of the Indian government. A father, caught in the vortex of unimaginable pain, stands defiant, seeking justice and truth in a world that seems to have abandoned his beloved daughter.

Priyadarshini's husband, Lingaraja, joins this solemn crusade, echoing the urgency for intervention from the Ministry of External Affairs. His words, simmering with a blend of anguish and urgency, emphasize the critical necessity of expediting the custody evaluations, a plea to shield their children from further harm and prevent the erosion of precious time. As Lingaraja candidly admits, the excruciating delay in the legal processes formed a heavy burden that pushed Priyadarshini to the brink, leading to the irreversible act during her visit to Dharwad.

Yet, amidst the fervent cries for justice and intervention, the Ministry of External Affairs remains conspicuously silent, a void that amplifies the family's desperation and loss, leaving them grappling in the dark for answers and resolution.

Simultaneously, the Australian government steps into this complex narrative, expressing a formal note of condolence. A representative voice from the Australian High Commission articulates their sorrow over the tragic event, extending their condolences to the bereaved family. As they offer consular assistance to Priyadarshini’s family residing in Australia, it marks the beginning of an international dialogue, an attempt to traverse the murky waters of this case.

This is a moment in time that calls for reflection, urging societies globally to reckon with the consequences of systemic failures and lapses in human empathy. It demands a unification of efforts, transcending borders to bring justice and closure to a family torn asunder. In this turbulent narrative, the plea for humanity, understanding, and justice rings loud and clear, echoing in the halls of power and urging a reconciliatory step towards healing and truth.

Reminiscent of other cases

As the complex narrative surrounding the Patils unfolds, it resounds ominously with the echoes of several similar cases strewn across different geographies, turning the spotlight on what appears to be a recurring and troubling pattern.

This narrative not only shares the heartrending tones of individual grief and battle but unveils a larger picture where the personal plights are, regrettably, not isolated incidents. A grim pattern is emerging where Indian and Indian-origin parents find themselves ensnared in battles with child protection services abroad, often perceived as the resultant discord of clashing cultures and misunderstandings.

These episodes evoke the haunting parallels with other cases that have garnered media attention, notably Ariha Shah’s ongoing struggle in Germany, pitted against the formidable Jugendamt. Another familiar narrative is that of Sagarika Chakraborty, whose traumatic ordeal with the Norwegian government culminated into an intense battle to reclaim her children, a story potent enough to inspire a Bollywood film, 'Mrs. Chatterjee vs Norway', headlined by prominent actress Rani Mukerjee.

Suranya Aiyar, a lawyer with expertise in child rights, lends a powerful voice to this rising issue, suggesting that this might be a part of a distressing trend where Indians and Indian-origin individuals find themselves singled out and "persecuted" by child services in affluent G20 countries. She points to a glaring disconnect in the way these systems respond to the nuances of different cultural backgrounds, painting a harrowing picture of children being held "hostage" by foreign child service authorities, seemingly unable to comprehend and address the intricacies of families who are either newly settled or Indian citizens residing in foreign lands.

As she speaks, her words reverberate with an unsettling truth - a system that appears unable to empathize with and understand the complexities of differing cultural values, leaving families torn apart and children stranded amidst legal battles that seem to have no end in sight.

In 2021, a cloud of despair enveloped Bhavesh and Dhara Shah when their 7-month-old toddler, Ariha, was taken away from them amidst allegations of a deeply distressing nature.

A routine visit to the hospital turned into a nightmare when German authorities suspected the perineal injury - a trauma located in the genital region that Ariha had sustained - to be indicative of sexual assault, despite the parents' insistence that it was an accident. The tragic unfolding of events saw the baby girl being separated from her parents on the somber day of 23rd September.

The Shah's plight, marked by anguish and a vehement cry for justice, has reverberated far beyond their immediate surroundings, catching the unwavering eye of both the Indian media and the populace at large. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) in India has not only taken note of the case but has escalated the issue, aiming to expedite the process of Ariha's repatriation back to India.

The incident, which sparked outrage and deep concern, led to a mobilization at the political frontier as well. A collective of women lawmakers, representing diverse political affiliations, have rallied together, embodying a unified front in their appeal for justice. Notable figures such as Congress's Rajani Patil, leaders from the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) like Supriya Sule and Vandana Chavan, along with representatives from the Samajwadi Party and Shiv Sena, namely Jaya Bachchan and Priyanka Chaturvedi respectively, have lent their voices to this pressing issue.

These lawmakers engaged in discussions with the External Affairs Minister, S Jaishankar, channeling the collective distress and demanding a swift and just resolution to the case. The series of events also saw German Ambassador Philipp Ackermann being summoned by the MEA, reflecting the urgency and gravity with which the Indian government is approaching the situation.

As the case unfolds, it stands not only as a personal tragedy for the Shah family but also mirrors a pervasive issue where cultural misunderstandings and suspicions seem to dominate the narrative, often leading to tragic separations and protracted legal battles. The unified front presented by the Indian lawmakers across party lines signifies a growing awareness and a determined stance against what appears to be a troubling trend of families being ensnared in complex legal webs in foreign lands, highlighting an urgent need for cross-cultural sensitivities and understanding in child protection frameworks globally.

Most recently, the narrative finds resonance in the ordeal of Bhavesh and Dhara Shah, who find themselves entrenched in a battle against Germany's childcare services, Jugendamt, struggling to regain custody of their child, Ariha. A battle that not only embodies their personal anguish but stands as a testament to a concerning global issue.

As this narrative unfolds, it stands as a grave reminder of the urgent need to bridge the chasms created by cultural misunderstandings and to foster a global environment where child protection services operate with a deepened sense of empathy and understanding, navigating the complex terrains of multicultural societies with sensitivity and nuance. It beckons a reevaluation and perhaps, a reconstruction of systems that truly stand as a safe haven for children and families alike, irrespective of their origins.

Support Us


Satyagraha was born from the heart of our land, with an undying aim to unveil the true essence of Bharat. It seeks to illuminate the hidden tales of our valiant freedom fighters and the rich chronicles that haven't yet sung their complete melody in the mainstream.

While platforms like NDTV and 'The Wire' effortlessly garner funds under the banner of safeguarding democracy, we at Satyagraha walk a different path. Our strength and resonance come from you. In this journey to weave a stronger Bharat, every little contribution amplifies our voice. Let's come together, contribute as you can, and champion the true spirit of our nation.

Pay Satyaagrah

Please share the article on other platforms

To Top

DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text. The website also frequently uses non-commercial images for representational purposes only in line with the article. We are not responsible for the authenticity of such images. If some images have a copyright issue, we request the person/entity to contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and we will take the necessary actions to resolve the issue.


Related Articles