History Archive

On October 31, 1984, Indira Gandhi, India’s then-Prime Minister, met a tragic end when she was assassinated by her own security personnel. Her leadership was a turbulent chapter in India’s history, marked by ambitious policies and significant blunders that left a mixed legacy.

While her public actions are well-known, WikiLeaks cables have unearthed lesser-known decisions that cast doubt on her strategic judgment. These documents reveal choices that, especially when dealing with a consistently unreliable neighbor like Pakistan, seem questionable at best. They expose a leader whose diplomatic moves often failed to account for the harsh realities of India’s tense neighborhood.

Indira Gandhi contacted Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto and offered to share India's nuclear technology with Pakistan. https://t.co/NOe0yWzjGY pic.twitter.com/SG9SMxA4G2

कोंग्रेसीयो को टेग करके पढाओ निचे दिया स्क्रीनशॉट।

ये विकीलीक्स वाले भी ना, कुछ भी लिख दिये। इंदिरा जी आयरन लेडी थीं, आ गई बात समझ में? 😏

#1974केबल

लिंक: https://t.co/QpgzYcqIyI pic.twitter.com/kdead4zgbW

Indira Gandhi’s Willingness to Share India’s Nuclear Technology with Pakistan

In 2013, WikiLeaks cables brought to light a baffling decision by Indira Gandhi that raised eyebrows among analysts. After India’s 1974 nuclear test, a landmark achievement that rattled the region, Gandhi offered to share nuclear technology with Pakistan—a nation with a long history of hostility and broken promises toward India. A U.S. embassy cable quotes her directly: “I have explained in my letter to Prime Minister Bhutto the peaceful nature and the economic purposes of this experiment and have also stated that India is willing to share her nuclear technology with Pakistan in the same way she is willing to share it with other countries, provided proper conditions for understanding and trust are created. I once again repeat this assurance.”

This proposal to Pakistan’s Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto appears dangerously naive, given Pakistan’s track record as an untrustworthy neighbor. The 1974 test, dubbed “Smiling Buddha,” was a proud moment for India but a provocation for Pakistan, which saw it as a direct challenge. Gandhi’s offer to share technology, tied to vague conditions of “understanding and trust,” overlooked the deep mistrust fueled by Pakistan’s frequent provocations.

Another cable reveals that Gandhi wrote to Bhutto, claiming India’s nuclear tests were no threat to Pakistan. Yet, the cable’s author notes that her letter mainly aimed to keep India’s scientific experiments from sparking controversy, suggesting her assurances were more about diplomacy than substance.

Gandhi’s decision to extend such an offer to a nation known for covert operations and shifting alliances was a risky miscalculation. Pakistan’s later pursuit of nuclear weapons, often through secretive means, underscores the folly of her approach. A 2013 article in The Times of India reported on the WikiLeaks revelation, noting that Gandhi’s offer shocked observers, especially given Pakistan’s relentless drive to match India’s nuclear capabilities (source: The Times of India, August 27, 2013). Her belief in peaceful cooperation with an unreliable neighbor raises serious questions about her ability to safeguard India’s strategic interests.

Indira Gandhi won the war but lost the peace, big time.

Even after 93,000 Pakistani soldiers surrendered in 1971, she let them go under pressure from Moscow and Washington—without demanding Pakistan vacate PoJK, without border formalization, without reparations for the war or… pic.twitter.com/6s1weaYeCj

Among her failures, the least talked about was also her worst. Until all official records related to the Simla Agreement signed on July 2, 1972 are made public, we will never know what led Indira Gandhi to conclude such a disadvantageous peace with Pak following the 1971 war. pic.twitter.com/tWNRd2HPkR

The Desire for Peace After the War of 1971

The WikiLeaks cables also highlight Gandhi’s questionable attempts to mend ties with Pakistan after the 1971 war, a conflict that crushed Pakistan and birthed Bangladesh. While the war strengthened India’s position, it deepened Pakistan’s resentment, cementing its status as a neighbor prone to provocation. In a letter to her Pakistani counterpart, Gandhi criticized the U.S. for resuming arms supplies to Pakistan, writing: “We have regretted this decision because it threatens to increase tensions in our region.” 

Gandhi’s letter called for both nations to avoid an arms race and work toward cooperation, urging restraint in public rhetoric. She wrote: “We feel strongly that both our countries must desist from propaganda against each other. Nothing can be more damaging to the prospects of cooperation and the fulfilment of agreements already reached than the resumption of hostile public postures. From our side, I can assure you we will do nothing to encourage suspicion and hostility towards Pakistan and I hope your government will also exercise similar restraints.” This appeal assumes Pakistan would act in good faith, a risky bet considering its pattern of violating agreements and fueling tensions.

Gandhi’s push for peace, while idealistic, failed to account for Pakistan’s unwillingness to reciprocate. The 1971 war had exposed Pakistan’s vulnerabilities, but it also hardened its resolve to challenge India through any means, including proxy conflicts. Her call for cooperation, as revealed in the cables, misjudged Pakistan’s deep-seated hostility and its tendency to exploit diplomatic gestures. A 2012 piece in The Express Tribune reflected on the post-1971 period, noting that Pakistan’s aggressive policies persisted despite agreements like the Simla Agreement, highlighting the limits of Gandhi’s diplomacy (source: The Express Tribune, July 3, 2012). Her willingness to engage with an unreliable neighbor suggests a disconnect between her lofty goals and the gritty realities of regional politics.

8. During emergency 1975 to 1977 Subramanian Swami was able to escape to USA twice!

9. After emergency, in Janata Government during 1977 to 1979 Vajpayeeji was Foreign Minister but Swami didn’t get finance ministry as Vajpayeeji told that he was CIA agent! pic.twitter.com/rDkSx0Unze

A Mole in Indira’s Inner Circle

One of the most alarming revelations made by Wikileaks in 2013 was that the United States had planted a mole inside Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s inner circle. The cables consistently referred to this source as someone from the "household", indicating that the individual had proximity to the highest levels of decision-making in the Prime Minister’s residence. This insider regularly passed on sensitive information to the US Embassy, including details about the internal politics and power dynamics surrounding the Prime Minister.

One such cable, discussing the controversial Emergency imposed in 1975, claimed that the real architects behind the move were Sanjay Gandhi and her trusted secretary R.K. Dhawan. It quoted directly:
“This is confirmed by a source close to the PM’s household. Both are non-ideological, extremely authoritarian in their general approach, and focused only on keeping Mrs Gandhi in power.”

This blunt assessment from within her own camp exposes the authoritarian culture that had formed around Indira Gandhi. Rather than surrounding herself with democratic-minded advisors, she leaned on a clique obsessed with control and power consolidation—regardless of ideological reasoning or public good.

A year later, another cable surfaced implicating Rajiv Gandhi’s close friend, Subramanian Swamy, in leaking crucial information. According to the cable:
“Subramanian Swamy suggested to department officer ten days ago that he heard Mrs Gandhi was prompted to set the March election date because she wanted to square things away in view of her failing health.”

Such disclosures cast a dark shadow on Indira Gandhi’s core team. Not only were her closest aides seen as authoritarian, but even private health concerns were being leaked abroad. The existence of such deep breaches within her trusted circle reflects a leadership that either underestimated foreign intelligence activity or was too absorbed in internal manipulations to recognize the risks.

Indira was anxious to please British, she was an anglophile, she inherited it from her father Nehru & her son Rajiv inherited it from her

Listen to a former PMO officer on how IG bent over backwards to please British

And today her grandson is claiming he is fight for the idea… pic.twitter.com/a6JDOUeXtG

Washington’s Unease with Indira Gandhi’s Rhetoric

If there was any illusion in Washington about Indira Gandhi’s diplomatic consistency, it was thoroughly shattered by multiple Wikileaks cables that revealed deep-rooted distrust and frustration within the US administration toward her.

While India was publicly critical of the American military presence in Vietnam, private conversations painted a hypocritical contrast. As per one such cable, Hurbert Humphrey, the then Vice President of the US and 1968 Democratic Presidential nominee, claimed that Indira Gandhi told him directly:
“It was absolutely essential that we (American Forces) were there.”

This complete reversal of public rhetoric shows how Indira Gandhi tailored her messages to suit different audiences, projecting anti-American nationalism domestically while privately endorsing the same American actions she criticized. It added to the growing perception of India under her leadership as being diplomatically duplicitous.

Another cable added that India saw the United States as a counterbalance to China, a threat that India had recognized long before the Americans. It read:
“India, it is sometimes hinted, protests against the US presence at Diego Garcia for form’s sake and to please its Parliament and that in reality, the Indians are glad that the US is there to check the growing Soviet power in the region.”

In short, India under Indira Gandhi was seen as two-faced—delivering sharp speeches against US military interests while quietly welcoming the very same military interventions as useful to India’s own strategic position in Asia.

Even worse was how Indira Gandhi repeatedly accused foreign powers of interfering in India’s internal affairs, a narrative she used heavily to justify her controversial decisions, especially during elections. According to one cable, these accusations “disturbed” several international observers, and their concerns were conveyed through Ambassador Saxbe. His message was blunt:
“In the best light, Mrs Gandhi’s elections could be seen as pre-election rhetoric; they could also be seen as justification for not holding elections.”

Such suspicions weren’t unjustified. The way Gandhi merged propaganda with governance cast doubt not only on her democratic intentions but also on her willingness to let India remain a transparent republic. Her tendency to play both victim and aggressor on the international stage raised serious questions about the credibility of her leadership.

Did you know that papa of @RahulGandhi was working as an Arms dealer during Indira Government?

Later he became the first Arms Dealer to become PM of a country@wikileaks had exposed how Rajiv Gandhi was Swedish jet deal's middleman in 1970s#CongArmsDealerWeb pic.twitter.com/zpRAAEkIx5

The Massive Corruption

Beyond double standards and secretive dealings, Wikileaks cables also pulled the curtain on one of the darkest truths of Indira Gandhi’s rule: massive, systemic corruption. The now declassified US cables exposed how bribery was not the exception but the norm during her government’s tenure.

The documents detail that tenders were intentionally manipulated so that contracts would go to pre-selected bidders. This wasn't just casual favoritism; it was a well-oiled machinery where the bidding process was reduced to a mere formality. According to the cables, punishments for bribery were “rare”, and more worryingly, only selectively applied. When politicians from Indira Gandhi’s own party were involved in corruption, the government turned a blind eye. However, if someone from the opposition camp was found guilty, strict and visible punishment followed—clearly meant to silence critics and maintain political dominance.

This deliberate misuse of government machinery for personal and political benefit makes it evident that corruption was not an incidental by-product of her government, but a feature of how it functioned. The focus wasn’t on justice or reform—it was on control.

The word Maharaja, which means ‘great king’, brings to mind a vision of power, honor, and stunning beauty. These royal figures were more than just rulers of vast territories—they were cultural icons who celebrated tradition through grandeur. Be it in their clothing, lifestyle, or love for fine craftsmanship, they left behind a legacy of splendor. One of their most admired passions was for jewelry—not just any jewelry, but pieces that dazzled with rubies, sapphires, emeralds, and diamonds.

India, a nation celebrating 78 years of independence, takes pride in the countless struggles that shaped its freedom journey. Among the myriad movements etched in the pages of history, the farmers’ uprising in Munshiganj, Raebareli, Uttar Pradesh, stands as a poignant reminder of the sacrifices made by ordinary citizens. Munshiganj is not only remembered for the farmers' courageous movement but also for the merciless massacre inflicted by the colonial rulers.

The history of Indian laborers in foreign lands is a tale woven with threads of hope, despair, struggle, and eventual triumph. One of the most notable chapters of this narrative revolves around the Indian indenture system, a mechanism by which over 1.6 million workers from British India were sent to toil in European colonies. This system, which began as a substitute for slave labor after the abolition of the slave trade in the early 19th century, spread its reach far and wide. These workers became the backbone of labor in regions such as the Caribbean, East Africa, Mauritius, Sri Lanka, and Fiji. Their efforts also shaped the Natal region of South Africa, as well as many other colonies under the British, French, and Dutch Empires. The indenture system continued for nearly a century, with British Indian indentureship formally ending in the 1920s.

The shadowy corridors of India's intelligence were shaken to their core when a spy scandal erupted, one that reached levels of treachery and deception previously unimaginable. As the arrests of those implicated in the country’s largest espionage ring continued, it became increasingly clear that the security breach was “frightening” in scale. Authorities, now deep into their investigations, began to voice a growing fear—"this case may only be the tip of the iceberg." What was uncovered thus far hinted at a deeper, more sinister network hiding beneath the surface, its roots possibly extending into places no one dared imagine.

Srivijaya Puram—the new name of Port Blair, comes with a fascinating history rooted in India’s rich maritime past. By renaming the capital city of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, the Modi government has taken a significant step towards discontinuing the legacy of British colonialism. Instead, it seeks to reconnect this historically important region with India's ancient naval and trade history. The decision, made official last week, reflects a broader effort by the government to honor India’s ancient connections. It is also part of a series of changes, as earlier the Modi government renamed three islands of the Andaman and Nicobar archipelago in honor of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose, reinforcing a deeper connection with India's nationalist past.

Dr. Anandibai Gopalrao Joshi emerged as a pioneering figure in the annals of South Asian history, distinguishing herself as one of the first Indian and South Asian female physicians trained in Western medicine. Not only did she break cultural barriers, but she also became the first Indian woman to step onto American soil to receive a professional education and graduate in medical science, setting a precedent for future generations.

Snehalatha Reddy (1932 – 20 January 1977) was an Indian actress, producer, and social activist renowned for her contributions to Kannada cinema, Kannada theatre, Telugu cinema, and Telugu theatre. She was notably arrested for her involvement in the Baroda dynamite case and endured over 8 months of imprisonment during the Emergency in India. She co-founded the Madras Players in the 1960s, an amateur group known for staging significant productions such as Ibsen's Peer Gynt, directed by Douglas Alger, in addition to Twelfth Night and Tennessee William's Night of the Iguana, directed by Peter Coe. Her portfolio also includes acting in, directing, or producing plays like A View from the Bridge and The House of Bernarda Alba. In 2003, her husband Pattabhirama Reddy presented In the Hour of God, a play inspired by Sri Aurobindo’s Savitri, which he dedicated to her.

The "Pakistan Declaration", infamously known as "Now or Never; Are We to Live or Perish Forever?", emerged as a pivotal document when it was penned by Choudhary Rahmat Ali on January 28, 1933. This pamphlet, significant for its introduction of the term "Pakstan" — notably missing an 'i' — marked its first usage and subsequent presentation at the Round Table conferences that same year.

During a recent election campaign event in Mangolpuri, Delhi, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi expressed his views on the inclusion of women in the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). He stated, "RSS does not include women; it is ingrained in their thinking that women should be kept as second-class citizens."