More Coverage
Twitter Coverage
JOIN SATYAAGRAH SOCIAL MEDIA
"Some judges are like umpires who believe they won the game": Madras High Court, "If temples are going to perpetuate violence, then their existence has no meaning, better to close down those temples. The whole purpose of having a temple is of no use"
It's an ironic day when courts begin to talk about closing temples, which are traditionally seen as places of peace and devotion. Last Friday, the Madras High Court made an eyebrow-raising statement. They claimed that our religious sanctuaries, our temples, are morphing into venues for ego-driven groups to flex their muscles, with no regard for the sanctity and the tranquility these places are meant to offer. Quite a paradox, isn't it?
|
The court, in all its worldly wisdom, said, "The objective of a temple is to provide a space for the faithful to worship God in search of serenity and bliss. Regrettably, temple festivals are now becoming synonymous with violence. They've been transformed into theatres for groups to parade their power. The essence of devotion that's supposed to be at the heart of these festivals is nowhere to be seen. Instead, they've degenerated into a vulgar display of dominance by one group over the other. This blatantly undermines the very reason for holding temple festivals."
Justice Anand Venkatesh brought to light the disturbing trend of these festivals spiraling into violent clashes among competing groups. He went on to suggest that maybe we should shutter such temples that seem to incite such instances of hostility. Isn't it strange that a place of worship, a house of God, is suggested to be locked up, just because some individuals cannot set aside their inflated egos?
The judge further added, "If temples are going to act as catalysts for violence, their existence loses all meaning. In such cases, perhaps it is best to close these temples to put an end to the violence. Until man sheds his arrogance and enters the temple with a humble heart seeking divine blessings, the entire purpose of having a temple is rendered futile."
The Court's comments came while hearing a plea by K.Thangarasu, also known as K.Thangaraj, who claims to be the Hereditary Trustee of Arulmighu Sri Ruthra Maha Kaliyamman Alayam. Thangaraj sought police protection to safely conduct a festival at the temple. Every year during the Aadi month, which this year falls between July 23rd and August 1st, this festival is celebrated. In light of this, Thangaraj filed a petition to request for police protection to prevent any mishaps.
|
In contrast, the State highlighted an ongoing dispute between two parties over the conduct of the festival. Despite conducting a Peace Committee meeting led by the Tahsildar, a resolution could not be reached. Additionally, there was a tussle over who gets the right to place the idol of Vinayagar inside the temple. Granting permission for the festival, as per the State, would lead to law and order issues. Consequently, the Tahsildar decreed that nobody should keep the Vinayagar idol inside the temple.
Expressing frustration, the court noted that the time and energy of the Police and the Revenue department are squandered in settling petty disputes between quarrelling groups. To add salt to the wound, these groups often lack any reverence towards God and are merely focused on proving their dominance over each other.
The court observed, “The valuable time and effort of the Police and Revenue department is unfairly consumed in resolving disputes between groups, who are battling over their right to conduct the temple festival. These departments have other crucial tasks to undertake, and their time is spent unwisely trying to mediate between two factions that show no piety towards god and are more concerned with displaying their strength. In this court’s opinion, it is imprudent to waste the precious resources of the Revenue and Police in matters of this nature.”
|
Therefore, the court decided that there's no need to provide police protection and the concerned parties are free to conduct the festival peacefully, provided their egos don't cast a shadow over the event. The court further advised the police to step in and take necessary action only if there's a threat to law and order.
After all said and done, the court dismissed the petitions, leaving the parties to their own devices. It's indeed a sad day when our places of worship turn into battlegrounds, and our courts, instead of delivering swift justice, talk about shutting them down. A classic testament to how we as a society have to wait for decades to get justice, and at times, we don't even get that. Instead, we get a series of endless trials and tribulations, much like a soap opera, but without an end in sight.
Case Title: K Thangarasu @ K Thangaraj v The Secretary
Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 205
Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.P.Ayyaswamy
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr. A.Damodaran Additional Public Prosecutor
Netizen's Reaction
|
|
Support Us
Satyagraha was born from the heart of our land, with an undying aim to unveil the true essence of Bharat. It seeks to illuminate the hidden tales of our valiant freedom fighters and the rich chronicles that haven't yet sung their complete melody in the mainstream.
While platforms like NDTV and 'The Wire' effortlessly garner funds under the banner of safeguarding democracy, we at Satyagraha walk a different path. Our strength and resonance come from you. In this journey to weave a stronger Bharat, every little contribution amplifies our voice. Let's come together, contribute as you can, and champion the true spirit of our nation.
ICICI Bank of Satyaagrah | Razorpay Bank of Satyaagrah | PayPal Bank of Satyaagrah - For International Payments |
If all above doesn't work, then try the LINK below:
Please share the article on other platforms
DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text. The website also frequently uses non-commercial images for representational purposes only in line with the article. We are not responsible for the authenticity of such images. If some images have a copyright issue, we request the person/entity to contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and we will take the necessary actions to resolve the issue.
Related Articles
- Justice Gaurang Kanth who took oath as judge of the Calcutta High Court this morning, his letter surfaced recently where he was seeking suspension of police officers who failed to keep the door of his residence locked resulting in the loss of his pet dog
- "Best advice I ever received was to give advice only when asked for it": State does not owe loyalty to any one religion and the Constitution requires that religious majority in the country shouldn’t enjoy any preferential treatment, Justice BV Nagarathna
- In another shocker, Supreme Court quotes 'every sinner has a future' and commutes death sentence of Mohd Firoz for rape & murder of 4-year-old girl: Child brutally assaulted, two teeth broken while smothering after rape
- Madras High Court: Do not take decision on melting Temple gold till Trustees are appointed
- Husband submitted that his wife living separately for 10 years, she implicated false 498-A IPC, in which he was acquitted, and prayed for divorce on ground of mental cruelty: Court concurred disputes not serious
- "सुरूपा बहुरूपाश्च विश्वरूपाश्च मातरः। गावो मामुपतिष्ठन्तामिति नित्यं प्रकीर्तयेत्": We are living in secular country & must respect all religions. In Hinduism, belief & faith is that cow is representative of divine and should be protected - Allahabad HC
- No evidence to tie Dinesh Yadav to violence, intention assumed based on him being Hindu: Anti-Hindu riots by Muslim community that shook the capital city of India and analysis of the conviction
- Controversial Marxist leader Brinda Karat reaches Jahangirpuri to implement Supreme Court order, fanatic Leftist journos outrage over order not being followed immediately and took to Twitter to attack NDMC officials
- In a court case involving rioting, arson, and vandalism during Patidar quota agitation, Gujarat Congress’ president Hardik Patel gets a stay from Supreme Court so he can contest elections: Patel was sentenced to two years in jail
- In a case regarding child custody of 11-year-old Kanak, Court orders minor girl to be sent to Nari Niketan: Rajasthan