×
Skip to main content

Friday, 10 May 2024 | 05:58 pm

|   Subscribe   |   donation   Support Us    |   donation

Log in
Register


"You can't serve the public good without the truth as a bottom line": Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi - activist journalist who used journalism to aspire political engagement & develop critical thinking among the masses, who lived- and died- for communal harmony

Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi was an ideal prototype of activist journalist who used journalism to aspire political engagement and develop critical thinking among the masses
 |  Satyaagrah  |  Freedom Fighter
Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi: The Journalist who sacrificed his life for communal harmony
Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi: The Journalist who sacrificed his life for communal harmony

The British polymath Thomas Carlyle’s wrote in his much celebrated work ‘Heroes and Hero Worship, (1841) “[Edmund] Burke said there were Three Estates in Parliament; but, in the Reporters’ Gallery yonder, there sat a Fourth Estate more important far than they all.”

This observation which often gets translated as, “Journalism is the fourth pillar of democracy”, has become something of a common sense when it comes to describing the role of journalism in democratic society. Journalism is generally understood as a noble profession whose objective is to spread facts, question the powerful and the state and spreading awareness among populace, all deemed instrumental for the development and functioning of a vibrant democracy.

Any analysis of present state of Journalism in the light of Carlyle’s wisdom is bound to characterize state of contemporary mainstream journalism marked by fake news, misinformation and toeing the line of Government etc. as pessimistic. In light of such deplorable and pessimistic present, perhaps we can train our telescope to the past and reflect on the life of a person who literally was the embodiment of Carlyle’s wisdom regarding the noble profession of Journalism.

The name of one such person is Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi, founder editor of Hindi newspaper Pratap and restarted the monthly political magazine Prabha. A freedom fighter, friends of Indian revolutionaries and a crusading Journalist cum activist, Vidyarthi was born on 26th October 1890 in Allahabad to a middle class family. After completing his initial education in present day Madhya Pradesh, Vidyarthi came to Kanpur in 1913 from where his remarkable career began. In his early career, Vidyarthi took an interest in the French poet and novelist Victor Hugo, and translated two of his novels namely, the Les Miserables and Ninety three.

Vidyarthi was an ideal prototype of activist journalist who used journalism to aspire political engagement and develop critical thinking among the masses. The first Satyagraha of Mahatma Gandhi in India i.e. the Champaran Satyagraha of 1917 began after Vidyarthi started to serially report on the plight of Indigo farmers of the region. Similarly, Vidyarthi’s reporting of Bijolia peasant movement in princely state of Mewer, brought in on national platform.

Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi was also played significant role in organizing and propagating the famous Awadh peasant-tenant movement and its offshoot the Eka Movement. He was also one of the leaders of the Kisan Sabha in Kanpur. Vidyarthi, apart from organizing peasants and raising their issues was also deeply involved with the working class movement, especially in the city of Kanpur which during his times was an industrial city. Vidyarthi organized the mill workers of Kanpur and established the Kanpur Mazdoor Sangh in 1928 and fought for their rights. The Partap regularly carried the plight of Kanpur millworkers who had to work overtime, were paid less than the minimum wage and had to live under pitiable condition.

Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi was also a prominent member of the Indian National Congress and he was served as the member of United Provinces Legislative council from 1925-1929. He also elected as the president of the U.P. Congress Committee and was appointed the first 'dictator' to lead the Civil disobedience movement in UP, for which he was arrested and put in Jail.

Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi though a member of the Indian National Congress and an ardent follower of Mahatma Gandhi, wholeheartedly supported the Indian revolutionaries. He published the articles and pamphlets written by revolutionaries, provided financial assistance and helped them to evade the colonial police. It was Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi who gave money to Ashfaqullah Khan when he was on run following the Kakori incident and published the biography of Ramprasad Bismil. Bhagat Singh used to work in Pratap and contributed articles under the pen name of Balwant Singh. Apart from that he also used to publish many socialist writings which helped in the intellectual development of Indian revolutionaries.

He even meet Bhagat Singh and Batukeshwar Dutt while they were in prison and extensively covered the historic 63 day long hunger strike of Lahore conspiracy case prisoners and mourned the death of revolutionary Jatin Das for over two months while constantly demanding rights for political prisoners.

A brilliant publicist, Vidyarthi consistently published against communal riots and communal politics and criticized Hindu Mahasabha and its leaders like Lala Lajpar Rai and V.D Sarvarkar and also wrote against Muslim communalism. It can only be a coincidence that Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi died on 25th March 1931 i.e. just 2 days after the hanging of Bhagat Singh, Sukhdev and Rajguru in the Lahore Conspiracy Case. Immediately after the hanging of the three revolutionaries, a riot broke out in Kanpur and Vidyarthi took upon himself to claim the communal passions running high and stop the rioting. Unfortunately he became one of the victims of the riots. His death was described by Mahatma Gandhi as “Shandar” (glorious) one which he envied! Praying tribute to Vidyarthi, Gandhi said that “let this noble example stimulate us all to similar effort should the occasion”.

In his almost 20 years of career as a Journalist, Vidyarthi was jailed five times (thrice for carrying publishing ‘objectionable’ content and twice for anti-British activities) faced Lathi charges and had to pay heavy fines, still nothing deterred him from fighting hand in hand with the oppressed, his crusade against communalism and the British rule.

If we draw a contrast between Vidyarthi and our present day TRP hungry mainstream media houses, we can clearly see how the issues of peasants, workers and oppressed communities have taken a backseat while spreading communal hatred and shielding the present Government from criticism has acquired the centre place in their model of Journalism which looks more like theatrics and Gobbelsian propaganda.

Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi is primarily remembered today through the awards given under his name and through the places and institutes named after him, but the ideals for which he lived and ultimately died for has been largely forgotten in the field of which he was a pioneer. In his career, Vidyarthi always stood for the workers, peasants and oppressed communities. He was a champion of communal harmony.

How Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi was killed by Muslims: An eyewitness account

Iqbal Krishna Kapoor, who described the closing scenes, before the enquiry committee, confirmed that Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi was thoroughly disgusted with the behaviour of the police on 24 March. The local officials, although unable to restore confidence themselves, were reluctant to take Congressmen’s help to stem the tide of loot and arson. The City Kotwal was equally dilly-dallying. Even when the Superintendent of Police was apprised of the situation, he did not believe in the complaints against the behaviour of the police. The instance of 1927 riots was also cited when Munro, the District Magistrate, had made arrests in the very beginning, but Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi’s pleadings in March 1931 went unheeded.

The same sorry tale was narrated by Taqi Ahmad, Deputy Collector, who accompanied by only a few constables arrived on the spot. By that time the situation had worsened in the Etawah Bazaar. When Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi reached that spot, he discovered that a Hindu, aged about thirty, had protected the lives of about thirty Muslim men, women and children from the madness of the rioters. He was then requested by Kanahya Lal to rush to the rescue of Hindus in certain Muslim quarters. But he stayed back in Etawah Bazaar and gave priority to transportation of victims by lorry to a hospital. Although the Deputy Collector on duty promised to provide armed escort, yet at the time of departure he could not keep his promise. The victims had to be transported without escort.

In the meantime, the crowd from Etawah Bazaar had moved towards Bengali Mohal and perpetrated the most horrible atrocities there. When Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi reached there, he started rescuing victims from the houses that had been set on fire. The rescued Muslims were sent to Misri Bazaar and Ram Narain Bazaar and were looked after. According to an eyewitness account when the rescue lorry had left Naya Chowk, Ganesh Shankar met the rowdies. When he reached Chaubey Gola, after passing through Misri Bazaar and Machchli Bazaar, even the two constables accompanying him returned towards Naya Chowk. He was then left with only a few volunteers. Even the person in the lorry transporting the victims was shot at and injured, so he could not accompany him. Then Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi proceeded all alone to the riot-stricken area.

From all available accounts Madho Prasad was the only eye-witness who was with Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi till the end. According to his record of experiences on 25 March, he had gone to Chaubey Gola by 3 or 4.00 p.m. The place was somewhere near the mosque on the Meston Road, and the conditions in the lane were horrible. A large crowd had gathered on Nai Sarak, and some volunteers requested him to address the crowd. According to the findings of the Congress Enquiry Committee report, “there were two hundred Musalmans, Chunni Khan, Khalifa in the Akhara of Bhakku Pahalwan, and five or seven other prominent Musalmans shook hands with him and embraced him”. Thereafter Chunni Khan and his companions took him away to another trouble spot. From Chaubey Gola they too parted company. Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi was then left alone to face the mob.

What happened thereafter was narrated before the Enquiry Committee by another eye-witness, Ganpat Singh. According to him, in the act of saving the riot victims, Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi was trapped in the midst of two crowds, one from Makar Mandi side and the other from Naya Chowk. It was here that some people started attacking him with lathis. At the instance of one Muslim volunteer, he was spared as he had saved hundreds of Muslims. But soon after, another crowd attacked him. When some people started dragging him to a lane, he said that he won’t run away. As he had to die one day, he would prefer to die, while doing his duty. But his noble words had no effect on the assassins who attacked him from all sides. One of his companions died on the spot. Another volunteer was stabbed with a knife. Last came his turn and as the assassin approached him he bowed his head down only to be mowed down. He was then stabbed in the back and another man attacked him with a khanta (an axe). He fell down and the eye-witness fled to Naya Chowk. The time of this fatal incident occurred probably at 4.00 p.m. and the wounded saviour of riot victims lay on the ground unattended. As to when his body was removed to what place on that fatal night, could not be ascertained by the Commissions of Enquiry. Frantic search was made for his body, but the same could not be traced till late in the night. People talked about his having been seen near Chaubey Gola and thereafter his whereabouts were not known. The attack on him at Chaubey Gola was also confirmed by Maulana Khizr Muhammad who deposed before the enquiry committee.

According to his version, Gamesh Shankar Vidyarthi had left his house abruptly at 9.00 a.m. or so, bareheaded and barefooted. He was all the time frantically appealing to Muslims and Hindus to desist from killing one another. His was the lone figure trying to control the frenzied mobs. The two constables and the Deputy Collector had already parted company. Even the last few volunteers disappeared when the fatal moment came. He was thus left alone to die.

Two days later, his dead body was found lying stuffed in a gunny bag in a hospital. Though his face had been badly disfigured, he could be identified due to his white khadi clothes. His identity was further confirmed by the three letters found in his pocket which he had scribbled on the fateful morning of 25 March. According to Dev Vrat Sastri, his distinctive style of hair and the word GAJENDRA engraved on his arm proved decisive in the identification of his dead body. Shiva Narain Misra and Dr. Jawahar Lai Rohatgi took charge of the dead body. With the arrival of Purshottam Das Tandon and Bal Krishna Sharma from Karachi Congress, the cremation could take place at 7.30 a.m. on 29 March 1931. Thus ended the life of Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi at the age of only forty-one years.

(This is an excerpt from Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi, Publication Division by Dr. M.L Bhargava)

References:

nationalheraldindia.com
heritagetimes.in

Support Us


Satyagraha was born from the heart of our land, with an undying aim to unveil the true essence of Bharat. It seeks to illuminate the hidden tales of our valiant freedom fighters and the rich chronicles that haven't yet sung their complete melody in the mainstream.

While platforms like NDTV and 'The Wire' effortlessly garner funds under the banner of safeguarding democracy, we at Satyagraha walk a different path. Our strength and resonance come from you. In this journey to weave a stronger Bharat, every little contribution amplifies our voice. Let's come together, contribute as you can, and champion the true spirit of our nation.

Pay Satyaagrah

Please share the article on other platforms

To Top

DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text. The website also frequently uses non-commercial images for representational purposes only in line with the article. We are not responsible for the authenticity of such images. If some images have a copyright issue, we request the person/entity to contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and we will take the necessary actions to resolve the issue.


Related Articles