Skip to main content

Friday, 1 November 2024 | 07:07 pm

|   Subscribe   |   donation   Support Us    |   donation

Log in
Register


"बार बार लगातार": Unveiling the truth - The Times of India revises its misleading headline after falsely implicating Indian Army officers in the harassment of Kargil war widows, sparking nationwide outrage and a demand for journalistic integrity

The accusations of sexual harassment levelled by wife of Kargil war martyr Indu Singh were directed towards State government officials and not officers in the Indian army
 |  Satyaagrah  |  Opinion
The Times of India Insinuates That Indian Army Officers Asked for ‘Sexual Favours’ from Kargil War Widows, Changes Clickbait Headline After Outrage
The Times of India Insinuates That Indian Army Officers Asked for ‘Sexual Favours’ from Kargil War Widows, Changes Clickbait Headline After Outrage

On Thursday (27th June), 'The Times of India' implied that Indian army officers had requested sexual favors from the wives of soldiers who were killed during the Kargil War of 1999. This controversial assertion was prominently featured in a headline that read, ‘We Kargil widows “were easy targets for officers to satisfy lust”.’

The wording of the headline was not only strategic but also highly offensive, suggesting that the widows of soldiers who died in the Kargil War were exploited by some officers in the Indian Army for their personal gratification. This type of sensationalist journalism compromises the respect owed to the widows and dishonors the legacy of the fallen soldiers.

By choosing such a headline, The Times of India exhibited a serious breach of journalistic ethics. The insinuation of such serious accusations without concrete proof not only sensationalized a delicate matter but also unfairly tainted the reputation of the Indian Army officers. Such conduct is not just reckless but also damaging, as it propagates misinformation and ignites baseless disputes.

Nonetheless, when the article is read in full, it becomes apparent that the individuals who sought sexual favors were not army officers but rather employees at government offices. This clarification underscores a notable conflict between the provocative headline and the actual substance of the report, prompting questions about the journalistic standards of The Times of India.

According to the newspaper, a 60-year-old woman named Indu Singh endured harassment and inappropriate advances at government facilities over many years when she was in need of support. This woman, a widow of the deceased Border Security Force (BSF) Inspector Inderjeet Singh, faced not only the grief of losing her spouse but also continued abuse in her interactions with bureaucratic systems.

She disclosed that a government officer in Meerut had acted improperly toward her, driven by lust. The offender even went as far as to touch her inappropriately with his feet, which added a dimension of physical violation to her emotional and administrative struggles.

Govt Officer Suspended After Intervention of LK Advani

“The officer was given the task of overseeing land allotment for construction of the memorials of martyrs in their respective villages. She says the officer even touched her with his feet when she was sitting in front of him for some help in connection with the allotment,” the report added.

The English daily reported that this particular officer was suspended following actions taken by Indu Singh, who reached out to the then Union Home Minister LK Advani in 2001.

According to a further report by The Times of India, “Following the officer’s inappropriate actions and hearing stories from other war widows about officers’ demeaning attitude towards them, Indu says she decided to approach the then Union home minister LK Advani in 2001 to complain against the officer. It was after Advani’s intervention that the officer was suspended.” This sequence of events highlights the significant impact of high-level intervention in rectifying serious misconduct.

Not an Isolated Case: Indu Singh

Indu Singh shared an additional instance involving misconduct by an officer at the government-owned Life Insurance Corporation (LIC), further underscoring the widespread issues in various governmental departments.

Officers at these government offices often engaged in behavior that was inappropriate and exploitative, such as making suggestive remarks, insisting that widows sit closely beside them, or requiring them to stay late. These actions constitute a significant misuse of authority by individuals who are supposed to uphold public trust.

She explained to the Indian English daily, “I was educated and objected to the act on every occasion, but the majority of young widows, who were illiterate and from rural areas without any exposure to the outside world, were harassed.” This comment sheds light on the additional hardships faced by those who did not have the resources or knowledge to challenge such treatment.

Indu Singh pointed out the demeaning view held by these officials, as they considered widows vulnerable and easily exploitable. She remarked to The Times of India, “I witnessed a complete lapse of morality during the initial days of widowhood.” This reflection indicates a deeply troubling ethical failure within the handling of these sensitive situations.

The Times of India Changes Headline After Outrage

It is clear from the detailed content of the article that the accusations made by Indu Singh, a widow of a Kargil war martyr, targeted State government officials rather than Indian army officers.

Despite this, The Times of India initially presented a misleading headline that suggested otherwise, potentially confusing readers who might not read beyond the headline. Due to the backlash on social media, the publication was compelled to revise its headline.

The updated headline now accurately reflects Indu Singh's statements: “We Kargil widows ‘were easy targets of govt officers’ unwanted advances’.”

In an environment where clickbait is all too common, it's disheartening to see a renowned publication resort to such tactics, which can erode trust and diminish journalistic integrity.

A Call for Accountability in Journalism

The actions of The Times of India in publishing a misleading headline about such a sensitive subject reveal a disconcerting trend in some sectors of the media to prioritize sensationalism over accuracy and integrity. This newspaper, which holds a significant place in Indian journalism, should bear a responsibility not just to inform, but to uphold the truth without creating unnecessary scandal.

It is deeply troubling that a respected publication chose to frame such a serious issue in a manner that could mislead the public, particularly in a case involving the dignity of war widows. This approach does a disservice not only to the subjects of the story but also to the readers and the broader community that relies on established media outlets for truthful reporting.

By sensationalizing the plight of Kargil war widows and incorrectly implicating Indian Army officers, The Times of India not only breached journalistic ethics but also potentially harmed the reputations of countless individuals. Such journalism fuels distrust and cynicism among the public, undermining the media's role as a pillar of democracy.

In the future, it is imperative that The Times of India and similar institutions adopt a more rigorous editorial standard to prevent the recurrence of such damaging lapses. Accountability in journalism is not merely about correcting a headline after the fact but about fostering a culture that prevents such errors from occurring in the first place. The media must remember that its foremost duty is to the truth, and with that duty comes the power to shape society—for better or worse. The integrity of journalism impacts real lives, and it is time that all media outlets recognize and respect the weight of that responsibility.

Support Us


Satyagraha was born from the heart of our land, with an undying aim to unveil the true essence of Bharat. It seeks to illuminate the hidden tales of our valiant freedom fighters and the rich chronicles that haven't yet sung their complete melody in the mainstream.

While platforms like NDTV and 'The Wire' effortlessly garner funds under the banner of safeguarding democracy, we at Satyagraha walk a different path. Our strength and resonance come from you. In this journey to weave a stronger Bharat, every little contribution amplifies our voice. Let's come together, contribute as you can, and champion the true spirit of our nation.

Satyaagrah Razorpay PayPal
 ICICI Bank of SatyaagrahRazorpay Bank of SatyaagrahPayPal Bank of Satyaagrah - For International Payments

If all above doesn't work, then try the LINK below:

Pay Satyaagrah

Please share the article on other platforms

To Top

DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text. The website also frequently uses non-commercial images for representational purposes only in line with the article. We are not responsible for the authenticity of such images. If some images have a copyright issue, we request the person/entity to contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and we will take the necessary actions to resolve the issue.


Related Articles

Related Articles




JOIN SATYAAGRAH SOCIAL MEDIA