Ahead of the planned 2nd October demonstration organized by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) targeting Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR), emerging digital evidence indicates that CJP organizers are mobilizing cadres across multiple states while openly discussing plans to replicate the aggressive, violent regime change models witnessed in Nepal and Bangladesh should the central government take any administrative or law-enforcement action against their demonstrators.

Internal Group Call Reveals Discussions on Replicating Destabilization Tactics

In an undated virtual group discussion conducted via Google Meet, several vocal participants—identified as Rakesh, Milan Nayak, Sarthak Tripathy, and others—made direct, extreme allegations against the Central government. The conversation, which took place in an unscripted mix of Odia, Hindi, and Bengali, went so far as to claim that the state is actively eliminating independent journalists who oppose its authority.

During the discussion, Milan Nayak stated:

“The government is killing journalists, those who are trying to raise their voice against the government.”

Following this claim, another key participant, identified as Rakesh, sought to reassure the assembled group by asserting that they command access to a dedicated battery of 300 to 500 Supreme Court practitioners ready to defend any cadre facing police scrutiny or formal criminal charges.

Rakesh insisted that should any central agency intervene against their membership, the incumbent administration would collapse within a single month through a planned wave of unrest patterned after the street protests in Colombo, Kathmandu, and Dhaka. He explicitly told the meeting:

“We have 300–500 lawyers who are working in the Supreme Court. If the Government of India touches anyone from CJP, I am giving it in writing that the government will collapse in 30 days, just like what happened in Nepal, Sri Lanka, and also in Bangladesh. So there is no need to worry or get scared, because if anything happens, then the entire CJP will come for our rescue.”

The participants then reviewed past legal conflicts to project an aura of institutional immunity. They argued that anyone who had confronted or crossed their affiliated network in earlier confrontations had faced severe legal repercussions, citing the examples of an individual involved in a dispute with the father of a member named Abdul, as well as Swatantra Bhardwaj, who stands accused of assaulting the father of activist Nishu Azad:

“They touched Abdul’s father, right?”“They are in jail now.”“The one who touched Nishu Azad’s father… he beat him up, right?”“What happened? He is in jail.”“He is very close to all the ministers.”“He is like a brother and a son to the big BJP ministers.”“What happened? He is in Tihar jail now…”“So that is the power.”“Exactly. That is our power.”

The discourse expanded further when Binay Kumar Singh, Director of the Dr. Syama Prasad Mookerjee Research Foundation, uploaded an additional recorded segment from the call to social media platform X on 27th September. In that excerpt, participants Rakesh and Sushrut Das alleged deliberate state interference with minority voter registrations under the current electoral rollout:

“A big thing that the BJP Govt has done is that they have removed names of Muslims from the voter list using SIR. Rakesh Singh says, Do not worry about it; in the upcoming Oct 2 protests, that topic will be covered & SIR will be completely boycotted and Stopped/banned.”

Local Representatives Demand Protective Measures; Network Claims Nationwide Army of 2,000 Advocates and Coordinated News Coverage

In a second recorded segment released publicly by Binay Kumar Singh, the conversation focused directly on organizing operations and providing institutional safety nets for field workers in Odisha.

When participants Mojibul Haque and Milan Nayak voiced concerns regarding what would happen if state or central law enforcement registered First Information Reports (FIRs) against local volunteers, Rakesh stepped forward to state that the movement maintains operational ties to an expansive nationwide panel of around 2,000 legal professionals. He stated that securing bail, challenging summons, and quashing police complaints across trial courts or high courts would present no challenge, emphasizing their organizational readiness to take every dispute up to the Supreme Court of India so that grassroots cadres would encounter zero legal friction.

The organizers also ironed out operational logistics for a joint capacity-building session between the organization's West Bengal and Odisha state units scheduled for 27th September to prepare for the 2nd October mobilization. Binay Kumar Singh highlighted the structured nature of this cross-border coordination in his summary on X:

“WB CJP unit’s Abdul who runs Social media Cell & Prakruti who is a Professor of a University will be training CJP odisha unit today. CJP WB has said if CJP Odisha karyakartas wants to join Protests in West Bengal, then travel expenses, food, Stay will be taken care by CJP WB unit & when Protests will take place in Odisha as well then CJP Odisha will take care of CJP WB karyakartas. This is basically a Synergy cooperation. Also Plan will be discussed for Big Protest in Odisha today in a meeting.”

Alongside their legal safety nets, the group openly discussed securing narrative support from friendly media platforms and specific digital journalists to protect the movement's public profile if street demonstrations escalate into confrontations.

The platforms explicitly named during this segment included Lallantop, The Red Mike, News Pinch, and Peek TV. The participants also confirmed plans to seek strategic leadership and ongoing media positioning from senior organizers, including Abhijeet Dipke, Saurav Das, and Ashutosh Ranka.

A Continuing Strategy to Replicate Foreign Regime Upheavals on Indian Streets

These recorded statements suggesting violent political disruption match a documented pattern observed over recent months. Earlier reports in July—initially cataloged by investigative outlets —showed that elements within these activist circles had previously raised inflammatory slogans such as "Nepal Bana Denge" during prior agitations, directly threatening street unrest and violence.

From capitalizing on the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) paper controversy earlier in the summer to leveraging the current dispute over Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and the SIR process, the group's chosen targets point toward a persistent strategy of utilizing polarizing flashpoints to weaken administrative authority in favor of the wider political Opposition. To insulate their street-level workers while attacking non-aligned networks as biased, the group's coordinators systematically rely on their self-declared panel of legal representatives, strategic digital publishers, and friendly commentators.

Co-Founder Confirms AAP Functionary Ajinkya Shinde Directed Field Demonstrations at Jantar Mantar

Long-standing assertions that the Cockroach Janta Party operates as a proxy front for the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) found direct confirmation during an open social media broadcast when key leaders conceded that their public agitations were orchestrated behind the scenes by a senior AAP party official.

On the night of Saturday, 26th September, CJP spokesperson Ashutosh Ranka initiated an Instagram Live stream. During the broadcast, he was joined by Ajinkya Shinde, an AAP Youth Wing office-bearer from Maharashtra. Together, the two used the platform to announce an upcoming mass mobilization termed "Jantar Mantar 2.0," framed around a direct demand for the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.

The broadcast became definitive when movement founder Abhijeet Dipke joined the live discussion. During this exchange, Ashutosh Ranka acknowledged that Ajinkya Shinde has long served as Dipke’s personal political mentor. Ranka subsequently confirmed that the high-profile, weeks-long sit-in staged at Jantar Mantar—which commenced in June and officially concluded on 25th July—was structured, planned, and managed by the AAP leader.

Confirming Shinde's behind-the-scenes role, Dipke stated:

“hmlog to kbhi kbhi stage par chale jaate the masti krne ke liye, lekin sara crowd management and volunteering sab Ajinkya manage kar raha tha.”

Background and Political Record of Ajinkya Shinde

Ajinkya Shinde was formally named the National Organisation In-Charge of the CJP on 6th August, despite maintaining deep, uninterrupted institutional ties with the Aam Aadmi Party.

Earlier in his political trajectory, Shinde resigned from private employment to commit full-time to AAP's organizational apparatus, subsequently rising to become the Maharashtra State President of the party's Youth Wing as well as a member of its State Executive Committee.

In May 2025, Shinde was publicly designated as AAP's Co-Incharge (Sah Prabhari) for Goa, a post he held immediately prior to transitioning into the administrative framework of the CJP. Ground reporting indicates that he continues to function as the Convenor of AAP’s Youth Wing in Maharashtra. Notably, Shinde has never tendered or released an official resignation terminating his affiliation with the Aam Aadmi Party; he simply stepped back from public visibility in those state roles to oversee CJP's administrative machinery.

The Pretense of an Independent Student Movement Unravels

This late-night admission strips away the narrative that the movement began as an autonomous, student-driven uprising. Instead, the disclosures confirm a structured political operation managed by trained party operatives.

By operating while shielding personal political backgrounds and leveraging the genuine anxieties of students and competitive exam aspirants, the movement's organizers directed public unrest while projecting non-partisan credentials. Thousands of student demonstrators who joined under the impression of a neutral civic platform were channeled into a coordinated party-backed program, leaving the group's non-partisan claims completely dismantled by its own leadership.