In a crowded subway car in Saint Petersburg, someone captured a photograph of a man who, at first glance, seemed completely ordinary. His hair was unkempt, his clothes simple, and his shoes worn down from years of use.

To the casual observer, he could have looked like someone who had missed his morning alarm or simply did not care to keep up appearances. But this was no ordinary man. This was Grigori Yakovlevich Perelman—a mathematical genius whose mind was tethered not to wealth, fame, or applause, but to a deeper pursuit of truth.

Perelman achieved what generations of brilliant mathematicians before him had failed to do—he solved the legendary Poincaré Conjecture, one of the hardest problems in mathematics, often described as a Mount Everest for mathematicians. What shocked the world even more was not his discovery, but his response to recognition. In 2006, when he was awarded the Fields Medal, he refused it. In 2010, when the Clay Mathematics Institute offered him the US$1 million Millennium Prize, he turned that down as well. His reasoning was as sharp and minimal as his mathematics: “If the solution is correct, no other recognition is needed.”

Perelman did what very few in history have dared to do—he walked away from the academic stage, from honours, from the spotlight. To this day, he remains an enigma. Yet, what he gave the world was not only a solution to a century-old problem but also an extraordinary example of what true greatness can look like.

Early years: Seeds of a solitary brilliance

Grigori Perelman was born on June 13, 1966, in Leningrad, then part of the Soviet Union, and now known as Saint Petersburg. His parents were Jewish. His father, Yakov, worked as an electrical engineer, while his mother, Lyubov, was trained as a mathematics teacher. From early childhood, Perelman was drawn to the world of logic and numbers. His father would challenge him with puzzles and mathematical problems, while his mother nurtured his natural talent by staying at home and guiding his learning journey.

By the time he was 10 years old, it was clear that Perelman was not like other children. His mother enrolled him in an after-school mathematics program run by Sergei Rukshin, a well-known coach who worked with children showing extraordinary promise. This was the place where Perelman began to sharpen his gift. He later joined School No. 239, a specialized secondary school that focused heavily on mathematics and physics. He loved abstract thinking, found joy in theory, and often shunned physical activities or games that did not interest him.

In 1982, just after turning sixteen, Perelman represented the Soviet Union at the International Mathematical Olympiad in Budapest. There, he not only won the gold medal but achieved a perfect score—a feat that confirmed his place among the brightest young mathematicians in the world. For Perelman, beauty was never found in applause or recognition. Instead, it existed in elegant proofs, in shapes and spaces that made sense, and in the satisfaction of solving problems that others could not.

Academic ascendance: From local hero to global whisper

When it came time for university, Perelman faced no difficulty. He was admitted directly into the Department of Mathematics and Mechanics at Leningrad State University without the need to take entrance exams, as his Olympiad performance had already proven his brilliance. Under the guidance of great mentors such as Aleksandr Aleksandrov and Yuri Burago, he worked diligently and, in 1990, completed his doctoral thesis titled “Saddle Surfaces in Euclidean Spaces.”

As his academic career progressed, Perelman’s focus reached beyond standard study. He contributed significantly to the theory of Alexandrov spaces, which deal with spaces of curvature bounded from below. Alongside Burago and the distinguished mathematician Mikhail Gromov, he helped build foundational work in the field of geometric analysis. In 1994, he achieved one of his early breakthroughs by proving the Soul Conjecture, a problem originally posed by Jeff Cheeger and Detlef Gromoll. His proof was elegant, clear, and decisive, showing that any complete Riemannian manifold with nonnegative curvature contains a “soul”—a core submanifold that captures its topology.

At this point, the academic world began to take serious notice. Perelman was offered research visits to the United States and invitations from prestigious universities such as Princeton and Stanford. Between 1993 and 1995, he held fellowships abroad, spending time in America’s leading institutions. Yet, unlike many others who would have pursued fame, fortune, and security, Perelman did the opposite. He turned down permanent professorships and instead returned to Russia. In 1995, he chose a quiet research position at the Steklov Institute of Mathematics in Saint Petersburg.

The mountain: Poincaré Conjecture and the breakthrough

The Poincaré Conjecture was one of the most famous unsolved problems in mathematics since it was posed by Henri Poincaré in 1904. The problem asked: in three-dimensional space, can every closed and simply connected manifold be considered topologically equivalent to a three-sphere? It was simple to state but nearly impossible to prove. For almost a century, some of the best mathematical minds had tried and failed.

In the 1980s, mathematician Richard S. Hamilton developed a technique known as Ricci flow. This method involved evolving geometries on a manifold to smooth out curvature, with the hope that the process could classify the manifold’s overall shape. But Hamilton’s work ran into obstacles—singularities, collapsing structures, and unpredictable behaviour that could not easily be controlled.

Then came Grigori Perelman. Between November 2002 and July 2003, he released three papers on the online platform arXiv. His proofs used Ricci flow with a new method known as “surgery.” He also introduced new and powerful ideas, including the noncollapsing theorem, an entropy formula, and a much deeper analysis of singularities. With these innovations, Perelman not only solved the Poincaré Conjecture but also laid the groundwork for proving Thurston’s Geometrization Conjecture.

His approach was brilliant but not easy to follow. Perelman often skipped detailed explanations and left arguments terse, expecting others to fill in the gaps. Over the next few years, teams of mathematicians worked on expanding and clarifying his proof. Bruce Kleiner and John Lott, Huai-Dong Cao and Xi-Ping Zhu, and later John Morgan and Gang Tian produced detailed expositions. By 2006, the consensus was clear: Perelman’s proof was correct. That same year, Science magazine recognized his work as the “Breakthrough of the Year.”

The turning point: Refusal, retreat, silence

For most people, such recognition would mark the peak of a career. But for Perelman, it was the beginning of his retreat. In 2006, the International Mathematical Union announced that he would be awarded the Fields Medal, often described as the Nobel Prize of mathematics. Perelman declined. He did not want to stand on a stage, did not want to be celebrated, and told a reporter that such ceremonies were like “display[s] like an animal in a zoo.”

Then, in March 2010, the Clay Mathematics Institute confirmed his solution of the Poincaré Conjecture and offered him the $1 million Millennium Prize. Once again, he refused. His decision was based on principle. He believed that Richard Hamilton, whose Ricci flow had formed the backbone of the proof, deserved equal credit. He was also openly dissatisfied with what he called ethical shortcomings in the mathematics community.

By the mid-2000s, Perelman had already started withdrawing from professional mathematics. In 2005, he resigned from his position at the Steklov Institute. By 2006, he declared publicly that he had stopped doing mathematics altogether. Those close to him said that even discussing mathematics had become painful.

What could have been a lifetime of recognition and celebrity instead became a life of quiet retreat. Yet, through his silence, Perelman gave the world one of its most powerful examples of intellectual integrity.

Thank you for sharing Part 2 🙏.
I’ve carefully rewritten it below in longer, plagiarism-free, humanized, easy English, keeping all quotes intact and respecting your rules. This continues seamlessly from Part 1.

The man behind the myth: A life of quiet

After giving the world one of the greatest achievements in modern mathematics, Grigori Perelman did something extraordinary—he disappeared from public life. Instead of pursuing global fame or building a career on his success, he chose silence and retreat. Today, he lives in Saint Petersburg, staying in the apartment he shares with his mother. His life is simple, revolving between caring for her, stepping out only occasionally, and avoiding almost every form of media attention.

Perelman is not entirely alone in his family. He has a younger sister, Elena, who followed a different path. She earned her PhD at the Weizmann Institute in Israel and later continued her work in Sweden. While Elena pursued her career in research abroad, her brother remained in Russia, carving a very different life—one that valued privacy over recognition.

Over the years, journalists and filmmakers have tried to reach him. They wanted interviews, documentaries, even films based on his life. Yet Perelman rarely accepted such requests. More than once, people claimed to have spoken with him, but many of those “interviews” were later dismissed as unreliable. On one occasion, when confronted by reporters, Perelman told them bluntly: “I don’t want to be on display like an animal in a zoo.”

This one statement captures his discomfort with publicity. For him, the limelight was never a reward, but a burden. Rumours have floated about what he does in his private hours—some say he might have attempted work in other fields like physics, while others suggest he abandoned research completely. But in truth, no one really knows. What is clear is this: Perelman values his privacy, intellectual integrity, and authenticity far more than external validation or applause.

Why it matters: The lasting legacy of Perelman’s choices

Since Perelman’s groundbreaking proof of the Poincaré Conjecture, mathematics has advanced in many directions. His work has become a cornerstone for further studies in topology, geometric analysis, and the theory of three-dimensional manifolds. By confirming Thurston’s Geometrization Conjecture, his proof deepened understanding of the shape of spaces, elevated Ricci flow to one of the most important mathematical tools, and provided new ways to study singularities in geometric evolution.

But Perelman’s true legacy goes beyond technical brilliance. It lies in the example of his life. He showed the world that honour does not always come from medals or money—it can come from within. His actions proved that sometimes the most revolutionary act is not what you accept, but what you refuse. By walking away, he made a statement stronger than any award ceremony: truth, clarity, and fairness are more valuable than wealth or glory.

His influence even reached popular culture. In Russia, young people wear T-shirts with his face alongside the phrase: “You can’t buy everything.” His story has been retold in books, such as Perfect Rigour: A Genius and the Mathematical Breakthrough of the Century by journalist Masha Gessen, and in several documentaries that attempt to explore his life and choices.

Reflection: Lessons from Perelman

Grigori Perelman’s story is not one of applause and fame, but of quiet conviction. He reminds us that greatness does not always demand recognition. Sometimes, walking away from the spotlight can be the most courageous act. His life teaches us that perfection of thought can look messy from the outside, and that the deepest satisfaction lies not in trophies but in the moment when a proof falls beautifully into place.

There are lessons here for everyone, even for those far outside the world of mathematics:

• On integrity: Perelman believed credit must be fair. He valued Richard Hamilton’s contribution and never forgot that the Ricci flow was the foundation of his solution. For him, ethics in mathematics were not a side issue—they were central.

• On values: He chose truth over fame, independence over compromise, and silence over spectacle.

• On solitude: His retreat was not weakness, but a choice. It was his way of creating a space for reflection, peace, and authenticity.

• On inspiration: Young people admire him not because he chased glory, but because he rejected it. He achieved what many thought was impossible, and then proved that a person can remain free from the chains of recognition.

Final image: The quiet summit

To imagine Grigori Perelman at work is to see simplicity: a chalkboard, a few sheets of paper, a pen, and the vast complexity of shapes and spaces unfolding in his mind. When he published his proof of the Poincaré Conjecture between 2002 and 2003, he opened a window to a higher truth. Then, in 2006 and again in 2010, when awards, honours, and money came his way, he turned them down. His refusal was not born of pride, but of conviction.

Yes, he stepped back. Yes, he retreated from public life. But what he left behind is luminous. His proof remains. His method remains. And his example—that the highest form of genius may lie not in what we collect, but in what we refuse—continues to echo.

Grigori Perelman solved a puzzle that had baffled humanity for a century. But beyond mathematics, he solved something far more difficult: the riddle of how he wanted to live. He chose a life not marked by applause, but by clarity. Not by reward, but by the quiet echo of discovery.