What could possibly go wrong? Celebrate diversity!

“I am here to train myself in hatred and terrorism. When I get out, I will kill many people because they are not good. I can recognize them. And children as young as one and a half, two years old, because they are innocent before they are taken by Satan.”

Samir, who has been remanded in custody for the umpteenth possession of drugs and carrying a stabbing weapon, is heard by an officer on arrival at the detention center. It goes without saying that the head of the prison, without waiting, reports the terrible threats that have just been made. The public prosecutor reports him to the judges for glorifying terrorism and repeated death threats.

Samir smiles broadly as he hears the President repeat his words. “I didn’t really say all that, I was just excited. I am not dangerous, my mother would tell you that."

The remarks, disturbing if any, made by the defendant on his arrival in prison, brought him immediately before the court.

Placed in pre-trial detention for yet another detention of narcotics and carrying a knife, Samir is heard by an officer on his arrival at the remand center. It goes without saying that the chief, announces without waiting the terrible threats which have just been uttered. And the parquet floor returns it in front of the judges to the apology of terrorism and reiterated death threats.

Listening to the president recount his words, Samir displays a broad smile. “Well, I didn’t really say all that, I was angry. I’m not dangerous, my mother would tell you that.”

He is as incoherent as he is surprising, but the expert psychiatrist does not detect any pathology in him.

The magistrate tries to understand: “Perhaps you smoke cannabis, sir?”

“No, hash.”

The prosecutor is pragmatic: “Extremely worrying, precise and detailed remarks. We imagine what he can do with his knife under the influence of drugs!” He demands 2 years firm.

“Yes, disturbing remarks,” confirms in defense Me Chassonnaud. “But which were not made in public and are not addressed to someone to make him commit a terrorist act. As for the threats … he does not aim no one in particular, and does not designate anyone. The offenses are therefore not constituted. He must be acquitted.”

The court can only admit: “there was no publicity and the threats are not aimed at anyone in particular.”

The defendant is acquitted.

References:

jihadwatch.org