‘Lord Krishna was the first mediator’: SC slams UP’s ₹500cr temple takeover bid, halts fund use, questions secret court order, and proposes retired judge panel to oversee Banke Bihari Temple while preserving goswami traditions amid ordinance challenge

On August 4, the Supreme Court referred to Lord Krishna as the “first mediator” while hearing the sensitive and ongoing dispute regarding the management of the revered Shri Banke Bihari Temple in Vrindavan, Uttar Pradesh. The statement was made during deliberations between the Uttar Pradesh government and the temple authorities. The Court’s invocation of Krishna’s role as a peacemaker from the Mahabharata was a symbolic reminder of the need for balance and resolution.
|
The bench, led by Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi, sharply criticised the Uttar Pradesh government for its “tearing hurry” in enforcing the Shri Bankey Bihari Ji Temple Trust Ordinance, 2025. This ordinance proposes a government-led takeover of the temple’s administration, which has traditionally remained with the ‘goswami’ families for centuries.
Adding to the concerns, the Court expressed displeasure at the “clandestine manner” in which the government managed to secure a judgment on May 15—one that permitted the usage of the temple’s financial reserves to fund a corridor redevelopment project. The bench noted that this was done “by filing an application in a pending civil dispute”, bypassing open deliberation.
In light of these developments, the Court suggested recalling the earlier directions and instead recommended forming a neutral committee led by a retired High Court judge to supervise the temple’s affairs during the legal review period. The ordinance’s constitutional validity is now to be examined by the Allahabad High Court.
During the session, the Supreme Court firmly instructed that “temple rituals will continue under the existing family tradition.” This was a significant reassurance to the goswamis, who have for generations performed the daily rites at the temple.
The Uttar Pradesh government had introduced the ordinance with plans to spend ₹500 crore from the temple’s resources for a large-scale corridor redevelopment project. In light of this, the Court once again encouraged peaceful resolution and dialogue, stating: “Lord Krishna was the first mediator, please try to mediate the matter.”
It was proposed that a part of the Supreme Court’s May 15 judgement—which gave the state authority over the temple funds—be kept in abeyance until further evaluation. During this time, a retired High Court or District Judge may be appointed as the managing trustee, ensuring that temple administration remains impartial.
The justices further directed that “the daily rituals of the temple would be continued by the ‘goswamis’ as before.” The committee, meanwhile, would include representatives from the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) for cultural preservation, and local administration officials like the District Collector, to ensure comprehensive development of the heritage site.
The Uttar Pradesh government has been asked to file a response to these proposals by 10:30 AM on August 5, when the matter is scheduled to resume.
According to the 2025 UP Ordinance, the state envisions the formation of a statutory trust titled “Shri Banke Bihari Ji Mandir Nyas.” This trust will oversee both the temple’s administration and the facilities available to devotees. The structure includes seven ex-officio members and eleven nominated trustees, with a specific condition that all must be followers of Sanatan Dharma, whether they belong to governmental or non-governmental institutions.
Support Us
Satyagraha was born from the heart of our land, with an undying aim to unveil the true essence of Bharat. It seeks to illuminate the hidden tales of our valiant freedom fighters and the rich chronicles that haven't yet sung their complete melody in the mainstream.
While platforms like NDTV and 'The Wire' effortlessly garner funds under the banner of safeguarding democracy, we at Satyagraha walk a different path. Our strength and resonance come from you. In this journey to weave a stronger Bharat, every little contribution amplifies our voice. Let's come together, contribute as you can, and champion the true spirit of our nation.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| ICICI Bank of Satyaagrah | Razorpay Bank of Satyaagrah | PayPal Bank of Satyaagrah - For International Payments |
If all above doesn't work, then try the LINK below:
Please share the article on other platforms
DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text. The website also frequently uses non-commercial images for representational purposes only in line with the article. We are not responsible for the authenticity of such images. If some images have a copyright issue, we request the person/entity to contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and we will take the necessary actions to resolve the issue.
Related Articles
- “The truth about injustice always sounds outrageous”: Supreme Court stays death sentence of M Samivel, who raped a minor girl and fearing that the girl might tell someone about the crime, he smashed her head against a tree and dropped her into a pond
- SC bench of Justices Chandrachud and AS Bopanna rules in favor of Muslim petitioner: “Don’t exclude non-Hindus from auction process for shop leases in temple”
- "Order Order बाद में, पहले exam की तैयारी करो": President Murmu champions the All India Judicial Service, aiming to revolutionize judicial recruitment across states, akin to UPSC's nationwide approach – a transformative stride in India's legal landscape
- "My Shelter Days are over, done, Because you, my master, took me home": Bombay HC imposes fine on citizens feeding strays in public places, "If these so-called friends are really interested in protection and welfare of strays, they must adopt those dogs"
- Supreme Court led by CJI BR Gavai rejects plea to restore mutilated Lord Vishnu idol at Khajuraho Javari temple, mocking petitioner Rakesh Dalal by telling him to just go pray, exposing deep Hinduphobia in the judiciary
- "आतंकवादियों को आधी रात, मरीजों को सिर्फ तारीख": While the Supreme Court held historic midnight hearings for Yakub Memon and Teesta Setalvad, a cancer patient died waiting through 57 listings for the Kerala High Court to lower life-saving drug costs
- "You cannot deny guilt, and thereby you allow the Curse to be your due": Lower court grants Divorce to husband after 19-years for 20-day marriage, Wife challenges order in High Court, not exceptional case as our courts are flooded with endless litigations
- Notice issued to Central govt on plea challenging the constitutional validity of Waqf Act 1995 by Delhi High Court: Ashwini Upadhyay filed the plea that Waqf Act is antithetical to Secularism in India
- "There is difference between blasphemy and expressing religious opinions based on one’s knowledge of the subject": Historic decision by Madras High Court from 2019
- Due to high public interest, the Law Commission has extended the Uniform Civil Code feedback deadline by two weeks, meanwhile, AIUDF leader Badruddin Ajmal misinterpreted the UCC, linking it to uniform attire and diet commenting 'sarees-for-all'
- "अंधा कानून": Kanhaiya Lal's brutal beheading by radical Islamists for supporting Nupur Sharma shocked Udaipur, and now, in a sorry state of justice, Mohammed Javed, who informed the killers, is granted bail, sparking outrage and fear across the nation
- "गुस्ताख़ी-ए-फ़रिश्ता": Delhi High Court dismisses Waqf Board's plea against Sunehri Bagh Mosque's demolition, led by chairman of the Delhi Waqf Board, Amanatullah Khan; NDMC seeks public insights, inviting suggestions and objections
- Vinayak Damodar Savarkar – A Misunderstood Legacy
- Height of Hypocrisy in the land of Law where accused is hailed and acquitted, but victim is shamed by Court and Church: A timeline of the Bishop Franco Mulakkal case
- "The weight of 59 lives demands attention": Supreme Court denies bail to three Godhra train case convicts, emphasizing its severity. The 2002 incident claimed 59 lives, including women and children, leading to widespread riots in Gujarat
















