More Coverage
Twitter Coverage
Satyaagrah
Written on
Satyaagrah
Written on
Satyaagrah
Written on
Satyaagrah
Written on
Satyaagrah
Written on
JOIN SATYAAGRAH SOCIAL MEDIA
"My Shelter Days are over, done, Because you, my master, took me home": Bombay HC imposes fine on citizens feeding strays in public places, "If these so-called friends are really interested in protection and welfare of strays, they must adopt those dogs"
![[Stray dog menace] Impose fine on citizens feeding them on roads, public places: Bombay High Court](/templates/yootheme/cache/1f/dog22oct-1f92d18b.jpeg)
In order to tackle the menace caused by stray dogs, the Nagpur bench of the Bombay High Court recently ordered authorities to impose a fine of not more than ₹200 on citizens who feed them on roads and in public places [Vijay Shankarrao Talewar vs State of Maharashtra].
|
A division bench of Justices Sunil Shukre and Anil Pansare noted that despite measures by the authorities, the menace of stray dogs has increased in Nagpur city because of the irresponsible behavior of some citizens, who feed such dogs on the streets.
It suggested such citizens should adopt the dogs and take them to their homes and feed them.
"These citizens posing themselves as sympathizers and friends of stray dogs offer food packets and different titbits to stray dogs unmindful of the great harm that they are doing to society. These supposed friends of stray dogs do not realize the disastrous consequences of their charity. Fed on the goodies provided by the animal lover, many of the stray dogs become insolent and get even more violent in their behavior towards human beings in general and children in particular," the bench observed.
The bench said that if these so-called friends of stray dogs are really interested in the protection and welfare of the strays, they must adopt the stray dogs, take them home or at least put them up in some good dog shelter homes and bear all the expenses for their registration with municipal authorities and towards their maintenance, health, and vaccination.
"They must understand that real charity lies in taking complete care and not just feeding and then leaving poor creatures to fend for themselves. This is the most basic duty a benevolent must perform if he has real compassion for stray dogs. But the so-called friends of stray dogs shy away from performing this basic duty of theirs and the result is of uncontrolled growth in population and nuisance of stray dogs," the Court said.
The bench, therefore, directed that in general no citizen or resident of Nagpur and areas surrounding it shall feed the stray dogs in public places, gardens, etc.
"We further direct that if any person is interested in feeding stray dogs, he shall first adopt the stray dog/bitch, bring it to home, register it with Municipal Authorities or put it in some dog shelter home and then shower his love and affection on it, may feed it while taking its personal care in all respect. The Nagpur Municipal Corporation to impose an appropriate penalty for any breach of these directions, which penalty may not be more than Rs.200/- for every breach," the bench ordered.
The Court further noted that Section 44 of the Maharashtra Police Act allows the destruction of stray dogs.
It ordered that authorities must consider implementing it though not to the extent of destroying them but detaining them.
"The action that may be taken under Section 44 of the Maharashtra Police Act, we add, may not be of the extreme nature of the destruction of the stray dog but, it can be at least in the nature of detention of the stray dog as per the procedure prescribed and then handing over the stray dog to the Monitoring Committee set up for their appropriate placement/ disposal," the bench ordered.
Taking the overall view of the issue, the judges said, there is a need for the authorities to take charge of the matter, as required under the law, and also the need for samaritans to come forward and render their assistance to the authorities in controlling the stray dog hazard.
"This is not to say that there is something wrong with the view that a dog generally is the best friend of man but, this has to be taken with circumspection when it comes to dogs that are strays and are not kept as pets. Many of these strays are aggressive, ferociously wild, and simply uncontrollable in their behavior," the bench observed.
Advocate FT Mirza appeared for the Petitioners.
Additional Government Pleader DP Thakre represented the State.
Advocate SM Puranik represented the Nagpur Municipal Corporation.
Advocates Ashwin Deshpande and Aradhya Pande appeared as the Intervenor.
References:
Support Us
Satyagraha was born from the heart of our land, with an undying aim to unveil the true essence of Bharat. It seeks to illuminate the hidden tales of our valiant freedom fighters and the rich chronicles that haven't yet sung their complete melody in the mainstream.
While platforms like NDTV and 'The Wire' effortlessly garner funds under the banner of safeguarding democracy, we at Satyagraha walk a different path. Our strength and resonance come from you. In this journey to weave a stronger Bharat, every little contribution amplifies our voice. Let's come together, contribute as you can, and champion the true spirit of our nation.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| ICICI Bank of Satyaagrah | Razorpay Bank of Satyaagrah | PayPal Bank of Satyaagrah - For International Payments |
If all above doesn't work, then try the LINK below:
Please share the article on other platforms
DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text. The website also frequently uses non-commercial images for representational purposes only in line with the article. We are not responsible for the authenticity of such images. If some images have a copyright issue, we request the person/entity to contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and we will take the necessary actions to resolve the issue.
Related Articles
- Madras HC’s split verdict on Thiruparankundram Hill—where ancient Hindu temples and Jain caves stand desecrated—ignites outrage as Islamists demand animal sacrifice and claim the sacred land as Waqf, sparking a battle for dharmic heritage
- "If it were not for injustice, man would not know justice": Supreme Court stayed arrest of the resigned principal of Indore's Government New Law College, Dr Inamur Rahman, in an FIR registered over "Hinduphobic" book in the college library
- Supreme Court halts the MP High Court order reinstating a judge accused of urinating on a train berth, branding the chaos on the Indore-Jabalpur Express as the gravest form of disgusting misconduct
- Hindu side filed reply in Supreme Court: 'Gyanvapi property belonged to Lord Adi Vishweshwar since time immemorial, even before the Islamic rule in India, and hence cannot be handed to anybody'
- “We know what we are, but know not what we may be”: Every human being has right to choose his or her gender identity: Rajasthan High Court ordered authorities to consider changing the records of a man who secured a job under the General Female Category
- Supreme Court of India led by BR Gavai halts key provisions of the Waqf Amendment Act 2025 after long Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha debates, sparking fears of judicial overreach
- "Unheard of:" Bombay High Court deprecated Maharashtra government for keeping a 21-year-old student Nikhil Bhamre in jail for a social media post that did not even name NCP Chief Sharad Pawar
- “Judgment does not necessarily relate to the judiciary system”: “There is a limit to criticizing judges. Give us a break” laments Justice Chandrachud, but in Nupur case emotions of judges were so extensive that it “diluted the beheading in Udaipur”
- "Access is vital in lobbying. If you can't get in your door, you can't make your case": CJI Chandrachud removed justice MR Shah from the bench hearing forced conversion for not succumbing to lobby's pressure, was scheduled for Feb, now listed on Jan 16
- "It is not titles that honor men, but men that honor titles": CJI DY Chandrachud lamented, "Hundreds of young people die in India due to honour killings merely because they love someone or marry outside their caste or against their family's wishes"
- "हम साथ साथ हैं": A mountain of cash found in Justice Yashwant Varma’s home led to the Supreme Court’s bold punishment—a transfer—because in India’s judiciary, crime sometimes just means changing the nameplate, not facing the law
- "As per Article 195 from the book ‘Principles of Mohammedan Law’ by Sir Dinshah Fardunji Mulla, Muslim girl above 16 is competent to marry any person of choice": Punjab and Haryana HC cites Sharia to justify child marriage
- Deputy CM Manish Sisodia’s close aid Nisha Singh held guilty and sentenced to 7 years in prison for inciting violence: A bevy of eminent intellectuals called it a political vendetta to whitewash her criminal behaviour
- "Law is not law, if it violates principles of eternal justice": Justice DY Chandrachud is set to become India’s 50th CJI, a judge known for his often liberal and dissenting views has been part of some landmark verdicts of Ayodhya, Section 377 & Sabrimala
- "Permission marketing is marketing without interruptions": Supreme Court responds to Vice-President; says as per Constitution, Parliament has right to enact law but Court has power to scrutinize it, Govt functionaries comments on collegium not well taken

























