"The weight of 59 lives demands attention": Supreme Court denies bail to three Godhra train case convicts, emphasizing its severity. The 2002 incident claimed 59 lives, including women and children, leading to widespread riots in Gujarat

In an impactful decision on Monday, August 14th, India's highest court - the Supreme Court - remained unwavering in its stance regarding the Godhra train burning incident of 2002. Despite the pleas, the court chose not to extend bail to three individuals previously convicted in relation to the tragedy.
|
This horrifying incident from two decades ago is etched in India's memory. A malicious, planned attack culminated in the heart-wrenching deaths of 59 innocent pilgrims. Among the deceased were 27 women and 10 children, whose lives were tragically cut short.
The significant case was heard by a panel of esteemed judges, consisting of the Chief Justice of India, DY Chandrachud, alongside Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra. The gravity of the incident was highlighted by the Chief Justice himself, who pointedly remarked, "The incident is not only severe but also more than just a solitary death."
Emphasizing the urgency of the matter, Chief Justice Chandrachud asserted that it's not a topic to be left in limbo. He firmly stated that the case needs prompt attention and deliberation. "This case requires immediate hearing. We cannot put it off indefinitely," he added.
|
|
While the apex court maintained its position against granting bail at this juncture, there's a glimmer of hope for the convicts. The Chief Justice indicated that a specially constituted bench would take up the matter, suggesting the convicts could try their luck again by presenting their bail pleas to this new bench.
The Sabarmati Express tragedy from February 27, 2002, is one that evokes sharp memories and emotions. On that fateful day, a mob, driven by extremist ideologies, targeted two coaches of the train in Godhra, resulting in a ghastly scene where 59 Hindu karsevaks, comprising children and women, perished in flames.
But the train attack was just the beginning. The incident ignited communal tensions across Gujarat, spiraling into riots that claimed the lives of approximately 1,200 people, injuring several thousands in the process.
Legal proceedings in connection with the incident have been lengthy and complex. Initially, in 2011, a designated court decreed death sentences for 11 of the convicts and life sentences for 20 others. However, a change came in 2017 when the Gujarat High Court, after reviewing the case, decided to modify the death penalties to life imprisonments. The same court, though, confirmed the life terms handed down to the other 20 individuals.
Support Us
Satyagraha was born from the heart of our land, with an undying aim to unveil the true essence of Bharat. It seeks to illuminate the hidden tales of our valiant freedom fighters and the rich chronicles that haven't yet sung their complete melody in the mainstream.
While platforms like NDTV and 'The Wire' effortlessly garner funds under the banner of safeguarding democracy, we at Satyagraha walk a different path. Our strength and resonance come from you. In this journey to weave a stronger Bharat, every little contribution amplifies our voice. Let's come together, contribute as you can, and champion the true spirit of our nation.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| ICICI Bank of Satyaagrah | Razorpay Bank of Satyaagrah | PayPal Bank of Satyaagrah - For International Payments |
If all above doesn't work, then try the LINK below:
Please share the article on other platforms
DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text. The website also frequently uses non-commercial images for representational purposes only in line with the article. We are not responsible for the authenticity of such images. If some images have a copyright issue, we request the person/entity to contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and we will take the necessary actions to resolve the issue.
Related Articles
- "She should have gone to the TV and apologized to the nation": Supreme Court lambasted Nupur Sharma for her comments on Prophet Mohammed, said "This lady is single-handedly responsible for what is happening in the country"
- Supreme Court refused to suspend Sanjiv Bhatt’s life sentence in the 1990 custodial death case of Prabhudas Vaishnani, ordering swift appeal hearing while firmly rejecting bail citing custodial torture allegations and Bhatt’s drug planting conviction
- "पैसा बोलता है": Khyati Hospital exploited PM-JAY by performing unnecessary angioplasties on healthy villagers at free camps, causing deaths, Dr. Vazirani, Dr. Patel, and others face charges of fraud and culpable homicide amid growing outcry in Gujarat
- "As per Article 195 from the book ‘Principles of Mohammedan Law’ by Sir Dinshah Fardunji Mulla, Muslim girl above 16 is competent to marry any person of choice": Punjab and Haryana HC cites Sharia to justify child marriage
- Mentally-challenged Tamil Hindu man executed for a drug offense by Singapore whereas India's Supreme Court shockingly commutes death sentence of child rapist and murderer Mohd Firoz
- “Left the religion, wanted the benefits”: In a major ruling, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court struck down a Tamil Nadu policy, declaring that Sameer Ahamed and other converts to Islam cannot claim Hindu reservation benefits
- "Intent to kill Hindus in Calcutta": Supreme Court stayed a Delhi High Court directive granting premature release to Rashid Khan, the 77-year-old mastermind behind the 1993 Bowbazar blast in Kolkata that tragically killed 69 people
- A fire, burnt cash, and a judge under suspicion—yet the Supreme Court refuses an FIR against Justice Yashwant Varma, asking petitioners to first write to the President and PM, shielding its own while justice quietly exits the courtroom, unheard and unseen
- In a decisive move for judicial integrity, the Gujarat High Court dismissed a baseless PIL alleging ancient Buddhist remains beneath the historic Somnath Temple and fined litigant Vilas Tukaram Kharat ₹2 lakh
- Supreme Court stays Allahabad HC order to take over land from Mohammad Ali Jauhar Trust: State Govt of UP allotted 400 acres to the Trust that violated the conditions and built a Mosque instead of a university
- "Best advice I ever received was to give advice only when asked for it": State does not owe loyalty to any one religion and the Constitution requires that religious majority in the country shouldn’t enjoy any preferential treatment, Justice BV Nagarathna
- "There is difference between blasphemy and expressing religious opinions based on one’s knowledge of the subject": Historic decision by Madras High Court from 2019
- 'Found stone carvings of Hindu Gods-Goddesses, lotus, Seshnaag, Shrigar Gauri shrine distinctly visible, absolute remnants of ancient Hindu temple': Survey commissioner Ajay Mishra reports, Muslim side continuously uncooperative
- "I am not inclined": In a pivotal turn, the Gujarat HC hints at no reprieve for Teesta Setalvad, accused of crafting 'mass graves' stories post-Gujarat riots, associate Rehman Khan's allegations point to her ordering the controversial exhumation of bodies
- "Civilization begins with order, grows with liberty and dies with chaos": Morbi bridge tragedy: FIR against the contractor who reopened bridge without fitness certificate, 135 feared dead, witnesses said that few youngsters were shaking bridge dangerously
















