"The weight of 59 lives demands attention": Supreme Court denies bail to three Godhra train case convicts, emphasizing its severity. The 2002 incident claimed 59 lives, including women and children, leading to widespread riots in Gujarat

In an impactful decision on Monday, August 14th, India's highest court - the Supreme Court - remained unwavering in its stance regarding the Godhra train burning incident of 2002. Despite the pleas, the court chose not to extend bail to three individuals previously convicted in relation to the tragedy.
|
This horrifying incident from two decades ago is etched in India's memory. A malicious, planned attack culminated in the heart-wrenching deaths of 59 innocent pilgrims. Among the deceased were 27 women and 10 children, whose lives were tragically cut short.
The significant case was heard by a panel of esteemed judges, consisting of the Chief Justice of India, DY Chandrachud, alongside Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra. The gravity of the incident was highlighted by the Chief Justice himself, who pointedly remarked, "The incident is not only severe but also more than just a solitary death."
Emphasizing the urgency of the matter, Chief Justice Chandrachud asserted that it's not a topic to be left in limbo. He firmly stated that the case needs prompt attention and deliberation. "This case requires immediate hearing. We cannot put it off indefinitely," he added.
|
|
While the apex court maintained its position against granting bail at this juncture, there's a glimmer of hope for the convicts. The Chief Justice indicated that a specially constituted bench would take up the matter, suggesting the convicts could try their luck again by presenting their bail pleas to this new bench.
The Sabarmati Express tragedy from February 27, 2002, is one that evokes sharp memories and emotions. On that fateful day, a mob, driven by extremist ideologies, targeted two coaches of the train in Godhra, resulting in a ghastly scene where 59 Hindu karsevaks, comprising children and women, perished in flames.
But the train attack was just the beginning. The incident ignited communal tensions across Gujarat, spiraling into riots that claimed the lives of approximately 1,200 people, injuring several thousands in the process.
Legal proceedings in connection with the incident have been lengthy and complex. Initially, in 2011, a designated court decreed death sentences for 11 of the convicts and life sentences for 20 others. However, a change came in 2017 when the Gujarat High Court, after reviewing the case, decided to modify the death penalties to life imprisonments. The same court, though, confirmed the life terms handed down to the other 20 individuals.
Support Us
Satyagraha was born from the heart of our land, with an undying aim to unveil the true essence of Bharat. It seeks to illuminate the hidden tales of our valiant freedom fighters and the rich chronicles that haven't yet sung their complete melody in the mainstream.
While platforms like NDTV and 'The Wire' effortlessly garner funds under the banner of safeguarding democracy, we at Satyagraha walk a different path. Our strength and resonance come from you. In this journey to weave a stronger Bharat, every little contribution amplifies our voice. Let's come together, contribute as you can, and champion the true spirit of our nation.
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| ICICI Bank of Satyaagrah | Razorpay Bank of Satyaagrah | PayPal Bank of Satyaagrah - For International Payments |
If all above doesn't work, then try the LINK below:
Please share the article on other platforms
DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text. The website also frequently uses non-commercial images for representational purposes only in line with the article. We are not responsible for the authenticity of such images. If some images have a copyright issue, we request the person/entity to contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and we will take the necessary actions to resolve the issue.
Related Articles
- "दरवाज़े को कुण्डी मारो, कोई ना बच के जाने पाये": Can the Centre shield CJP hooligans who attacked Delhi police after Jantar Mantar rallies, when CJI Surya Kant insists that political promises cannot override the law and grant mob immunity
- ‘Do we roll out a red carpet?’ Supreme Court led by CJI Surya Kant issues a sharp warning as it questions illegal Rohingya migrants entering India and a rising crisis over missing refugees nationwide.
- "In law, not all authorities are 'public'": In a twist that could inspire satirists everywhere, the Bombay High Court clarifies that the Archbishop of Goa isn't under RTI, apparently, divine decrees are no match for bureaucratic ones in the court of law!
- "Honor or Endure": Azad Ansari's 3-year sentence for insulting Sri Ganesh during Ganeshotsav on Facebook, a stark warning in Gujarat; respect Hindu beliefs while in Bharat or face legal consequences, a significant verdict upholding Hindu religious dignity
- Madras High Court ends decades-old dispute by cancelling illegal sale of 3.93 acres of Arulmigu Annamalainathar Temple land in Kadayanallur, orders restoration to the deity and rejects revival of the void auction
- "Justice delayed is justice denied": Public servant can be held guilty under Prevention of Corruption Act based on circumstantial evidence: Supreme Court, 'mere acceptance of an illegal gratification without anything more would not make it an offence'
- Chief Justice DY Chandrachud calls on lawyers and bar bodies to elevate the Court and Constitution above political biases, following his notable criticism of SCBA President Aggarwala's request for a suo motu review of the Electoral Bonds judgment
- "Abuse is the weapon of the vulgar": Supreme Court to hear PIL for constitution of National Commission for Men, in total of 1,18,979 men suicide in the given year accounted 72% of the total suicide cases whereas women suicide represented roughly 27% only
- "Power of the lawyer is in the uncertainty of the law": Kerala High Court - Nudity should not be tied to sex. Mere sight of the naked upper body of the woman should not be deemed to be sexual, Just as beauty is in the eyes of the beholder, so is obscenity
- "किजिये मीटिंग मीटिंग": In response to the 'absolute failure of state machinery,' Calcutta High Court lambasts the West Bengal govt, threatening to close RG Kar Hospital & relocate patients, while ordering a CBI probe into the alarming vandalism incident
- "Access is vital in lobbying. If you can't get in your door, you can't make your case": CJI Chandrachud removed justice MR Shah from the bench hearing forced conversion for not succumbing to lobby's pressure, was scheduled for Feb, now listed on Jan 16
- "Ayodhya hui hamari, ab Kashi-Mathura ki baari": Plea submitted in Mathura Court to secure Shahi Idgah Masjid to protect Hindu sacred artefacts after Shivling discovered at wuzukhana in Gyanvapi premises
- "Virtue can only flourish among equals": Law Commission of India solicits views & ideas of the public and recognized religious organizations about Uniform Civil Code, interested can present their views within a period of 30 days from the date of Notice
- Milords, why demand to stand above criticism when democracy thrives on questioning, for Justice B Sudershan Reddy’s Salwa Judum verdict shows even judges must face accountability, no matter how powerful their robes once were
- "No neutrality, there is only greater or lesser awareness of one's bias": Joshimath Sinking - Supreme Court refuses urgent hearing, "there are democratically elected institutions to look into issue & everything of urgency does not have to come to court"
















